Australia backs ICC’s role but says ‘no equivalence’ between Israel and Hamas (2024)

The international court’s chief prosecutor, Karim Khan, said on Monday he believed Netanyahu, Gallant and Hamas leaders Yahya Sinwar, Mohammed Deif and Ismail Haniyeh bore criminal responsibility for war crimes against civilians in the Gaza Strip and Israel.

Khan alleged Netanyahu used starvation as a method of warfare, intentionally directed attacks against a civilian population and wilfully caused great suffering.

Sinwar, Hamas’s leader in Gaza, faces allegations of responsibility for extermination and murder, as well as the taking of hostages, torture, rape, other acts of sexual violence and cruel treatment.

Khan’s request has gone to a pre-trial chamber, which will decide whether to issue arrest warrants.

Asked about Khan’s allegations at a press conference in Parramatta on Tuesday, Albanese said: “I don’t comment on court processes in Australia, let alone court processes globally to which Australia is not a party.”

Regarding the Middle East, he said that it was important to condemn Hamas’ October 7 attack on Israel that sparked the conflict and focus on the release of Israeli hostages, a humanitarian ceasefire and increased humanitarian aid for the people of Gaza.

‘The international rule of law [should be] applied fairly … to draw an equivalence between Israel and Hamas I think is repugnant.’

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton

“We’ve said that every life matters, whether it be Israeli or Palestinian, and we’ve called for progress towards a two-state solution,” he said.

Albanese’s comments differed from those of Biden, who called the prosecutor’s effort to arrest Netanyahu and Gallant outrageous.

“Whatever this prosecutor might imply, there is no equivalence – none – between Israel and Hamas,” Biden said.

Loading

An estimated 1200 people were killed and 250 taken hostage when Hamas militants stormed into Israeli towns on October 7.

The war has killed at least 35,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry, which does not distinguish between combatants and civilians. About 80 per cent of the population of 2.3 million Palestinians has been displaced within the territory.

Dutton on Tuesday backed Biden’s stance, saying Khan’s allegations were antisemitic.

“[Albanese is] not showing leadership in relation to antisemitism and he’s tarnishing and damaging our international relationships with like-minded nations when he’s not strong enough to stand up alongside President Biden ... it’s an abomination, the ICC, and it needs to be ceased, this action is antisemitic,” Dutton said in Melbourne.

“We need to make sure the international rule of law is applied fairly and not on a political basis and to draw an equivalence between Israel and Hamas I think is repugnant.”

Energy Minister Chris Bowen, whose western Sydney electorate has a large Muslim population, criticised Dutton’s comments as irresponsible.

“I respect the International Criminal Court and … the work they do. International law must be respected and, of course, [it] was not respected by Hamas. Israel must respect international law,” he said on Sky.

“I heard ... Peter Dutton’s comments which were, in and of themselves, highly irresponsible by Peter Dutton to drag this through a domestic political debate ... international law must always be observed and nobody gets a free pass for that.”

The allegations of war crimes have received mixed reactions from key representative groups, with the Australia Palestine Advocacy Network welcoming Khan’s application while the Executive Council of Australian Jewry condemned the allegations.

Loading

The council’s co-chief executive, Alex Ryvchin, said Khan’s allegations were “a dangerous politicisation of the ICC” and “obliterates the moral and legal distinction between terrorists and democratic states”.

“When an ally comes under a mendacious political attack such as this, it needs its friends in the international community to stand with it,” he said.

“President Biden demonstrated true friendship and we expect no less of our government.”

Australia Palestine Advocacy Network president Nasser Mashni said the application had been “a long time coming” and urged Australia to align with the court’s application and use its voice to “end the genocide and ensure justice is done”.

Liberal senator Dave Sharma, who served as Australia’s ambassador to Israel, blasted the application, saying: “The moral equivalence being practised here is sickening and preposterous. This decision completely undermines the seriousness and credibility of the International Criminal Court.”

Greens foreign affairs spokesman Jordon Steele-John said: “The findings of the ICC prosecutor have reinforced what so many in our community already knew: there have been serious and sustained breaches of international law in Israel’s genocide in Gaza and Hamas’ attacks on civilians on October 7th and the treatment of hostages since.

“Australia must immediately sanction Netanyahu and his war cabinet, stop arms exports to Israel and expel the ambassador until Israel fully complies with the orders of the ICJ [International Court of Justice] and investigations by the ICC.”

Cut through the noise of federal politics with news, views and expert analysis. Subscribers can sign up to our weekly Inside Politics newsletter.

Australia backs ICC’s role but says ‘no equivalence’ between Israel and Hamas (2024)

FAQs

Australia backs ICC’s role but says ‘no equivalence’ between Israel and Hamas? ›

The federal government has insisted there is no moral equivalence between Israel and Hamas while backing the International Criminal Court's role upholding international law after the court's top prosecutor sensationally requested arrest warrants for Israel's prime minister and defence chief as well as three Hamas ...

Is Australia a member of the ICC? ›

The court was established by the Rome Statute, which entered into force generally on 1 July 2002, and for Australia on 1 September 2002. As a state party to the Rome Statute, Australia has a general obligation to cooperate fully with the court's investigations and prosecutions.

Is Israel signatory of the ICC? ›

Israel is not a member of the ICC and disputes the ICC's jurisdiction, presenting the point of view according to which Palestine is not a sovereign state capable of being a party to the Rome Statute. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu repeatedly condemned the allegations and investigation as "antisemitic".

Does the US recognize the ICC? ›

Is the US a member of the ICC? The US is not a state party to the Rome Statute. The US participated in the negotiations that led to the creation of the court. However, in 1998 the US was one of only seven countries - along with China, Iraq, Israel, Libya, Qatar, and Yemen - that voted against the Rome Statute.

Does the ICC have any real power? ›

The International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague is a permanent global court that has the power to prosecute individuals and leaders for genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.

Which countries do not recognize ICC? ›

The Hague-based ICC seeks to investigate and prosecute those responsible for grave offenses such as genocide and war crimes. There are 124 member countries, but dozens of governments are not ICC parties, including China, India, Israel, Russia, and the United States.

Why is China not a member of ICC? ›

Chief among China's concerns about the ICC is its vulnerability to political influence and interference, since any of its individual prosecutors can make the decision to begin an investigation. China objects to the fact the court has the power to judge whether a state is able or willing to prosecute its own nationals.

Does UN recognize Israel as a country? ›

The State of Israel was established on 14 May, 1948 by the Israeli Declaration of Independence. They became a member of the United Nations on 11 May, 1949. 85% of UN members recognise Israel.

Was Palestine a country before Israel? ›

While the State of Israel was established on 15 May 1948 and admitted to the United Nations, a Palestinian State was not established. The remaining territories of pre-1948 Palestine, the West Bank - including East Jerusalem- and Gaza Strip, were administered from 1948 till 1967 by Jordan and Egypt, respectively.

What countries do not recognize Palestine? ›

Among the G20, nine countries (Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, and Turkey, as well as permanent invitee Spain) have recognized Palestine as a state, while ten countries (Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Mexico, South Korea, the United Kingdom, and the ...

Why has the US refused to join the ICC? ›

Incompatibility with the U.S. Constitution

United States participation in the ICC treaty regime would also be unconstitutional because it would allow the trial of U.S. citizens for crimes committed on U.S. soil, which are otherwise entirely within the judicial power of the United States.

Is Palestine a member of the ICC? ›

Palestine became the 123rd member of the International Criminal Court (ICC) On April 1, 2015. By joining the ICC, Palestinian leaders hope to increase their political leverage by threatening to bring charges against Israeli officials for war crimes committed in the Occupied Territories.

Does the UK recognize the ICC? ›

The UK is a founding member of the ICC and prides itself as being a strong supporter of international justice. In recent years, it has pushed for an ICC mandate over crisis situations in non-member countries, including Syria and Libya.

Why is the ICC not effective? ›

Lack of Resources: While the ICC is directed to try the most serious crimes, it is given “a budget that enables only a handful of prosecutions per year”. Because of the small number of sitting judges, the ICC can hear only a limited number of cases at any given time.

Can the UNSC veto the ICC? ›

No. The International Criminal Court is an independent judicial institution that it is not subject to political control.

Does the UN support the ICC? ›

The ICC is not part of the UN

The Court was established by the Rome Statute. This treaty was negotiated within the UN; it created an independent judicial body distinct from the UN. The Rome Statute was the outcome of a long process of consideration of the question of international criminal law within the UN.

Is Australia a member of the World Trade Organization? ›

Australia has been a Member of the WTO since its founding in 1995.

Is New Zealand a member of ICC? ›

On 8 September 2000, New Zealand became one of the founding members of the Rome Statute, which established the International Criminal Court (the ICC). The ICC has jurisdiction over individuals who commit genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and the crime of aggression.

Does Australia belong to any international organization? ›

Australia and the United States belong to a number of the same international organizations, including the United Nations, ASEAN Regional Forum, Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), G-20, International Monetary Fund (IMF), Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), World Bank, and the World Trade ...

What are the member countries of ICC? ›

124 countries are States Parties to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Out of them 33 are African States, 19 are Asia-Pacific States, 19 are from Eastern Europe, 28 are from Latin American and Caribbean States, and 25 are from Western European and other States.

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Ouida Strosin DO

Last Updated:

Views: 5996

Rating: 4.6 / 5 (56 voted)

Reviews: 87% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Ouida Strosin DO

Birthday: 1995-04-27

Address: Suite 927 930 Kilback Radial, Candidaville, TN 87795

Phone: +8561498978366

Job: Legacy Manufacturing Specialist

Hobby: Singing, Mountain biking, Water sports, Water sports, Taxidermy, Polo, Pet

Introduction: My name is Ouida Strosin DO, I am a precious, combative, spotless, modern, spotless, beautiful, precious person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.